<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So That&#8217;s What &#8220;Minimal&#8221; Means&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.handcoding.com/archives/2005/06/01/so-thats-what-minimal-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.handcoding.com/archives/2005/06/01/so-thats-what-minimal-means/</link>
	<description>Refenestration Daily.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john s. rhodes</title>
		<link>http://www.handcoding.com/archives/2005/06/01/so-thats-what-minimal-means/comment-page-1/#comment-9710</link>
		<dc:creator>john s. rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.handcoding.com/?p=871#comment-9710</guid>
		<description>Seems like the difference between actual vs. possible, or applied vs. theoretical. 

Language is very fluid. It doesn't seem fluid, but it definitely is. I'm just happy that people will listen to me, let alone understand me, or (gasp!) agree with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the difference between actual vs. possible, or applied vs. theoretical. </p>
<p>Language is very fluid. It doesn&#8217;t seem fluid, but it definitely is. I&#8217;m just happy that people will listen to me, let alone understand me, or (gasp!) agree with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.handcoding.com/archives/2005/06/01/so-thats-what-minimal-means/comment-page-1/#comment-9683</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.handcoding.com/?p=871#comment-9683</guid>
		<description>"Fallen into the trap of common usage."

I don't understand prescriptive linguistics. How does language change and evolve if it may only do so when sanctioned by linguists and grammar nuts?

Awful used to mean something other than terrible. Do you want to tell people to only use it to mean awe-inspiring? For a more modern example, how about peruse? Do you want people to only use it to mean to study with great care? I don't know if I've ever heard it used to mean anything other than to glance through, so why doesn't it just mean that. 

I'm in the descriptive linguistics camp, personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fallen into the trap of common usage.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand prescriptive linguistics. How does language change and evolve if it may only do so when sanctioned by linguists and grammar nuts?</p>
<p>Awful used to mean something other than terrible. Do you want to tell people to only use it to mean awe-inspiring? For a more modern example, how about peruse? Do you want people to only use it to mean to study with great care? I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ve ever heard it used to mean anything other than to glance through, so why doesn&#8217;t it just mean that. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the descriptive linguistics camp, personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
