Marmite Redux

I wrote about Marmite the other day. And, through reading over the FAQ, they suggested that, in addition to Marmite-on-bread, Marmite could also function well as a sandwich enhancer.

So, just now, I was ready for lunch (yeah, 2:40 is a bit late for lunch, but I had pancakes earlier). Anyhow, as usual, I decided to have a tuna sandwich (with tomatoes). And, I figured on trying it with some Marmite this time — ooh, it was good. You wouldn’t think that Marmite would make much difference, but it was very tasty. Of course, if you don’t like Marmite in the first place, then there’s not much point in trying it as a sandwich enhancer ;).

Hosting for Autocross Video?

I have some DivX footage from my last autocross. I’d like to post it, but it’s 63 MB (and even the low-quality version is 55 MB). And, with my current hosting plan, I only get 300 MB trasfer/month.

So, if anyone would be able to host the file, please let me know :-). I figure that it wouldn’t be downloaded more than about a dozen times, but even that would still bust my trasfer quota.

Update: Hosting found — the video is now online.

Pittsburgh Speech

Via the American Dialect Society’s mailing list, I discovered this CMU site on Pittsburgh Speech & Language.

The site is similar to Pittsburghese.com, but this one includes the etymology for each word as well. For instance:

Jag (as in jag off or jagging around)

Definition: Various forms involving jag have to do with annoying, irritating, teasing, or playing tricks on. To jag someone or jag someone off means to irritate or tease. To jag around means to fool around, goof off. A jagoff is a person who is irritating because of being inept or stupid.

Text example: “I don't know why she keeps jagging me all the time”
—Dictionary of American Regional English, 1968.

Origin: The exact origin of this word is unknown, but the source language is probably Scotch-Irish English. “To jag” means to turn sharply.

And, yes, people really do talk like that in Pittsburgh :-)

Reduced Fat Peanut Butter

In a comment to yesterday’s entry on peanut butter and banana sandwiches, Adrian asks:

The important details! Did you get creamy or crunchy?

Also how does the low fat peanut butter compare to the regular in taste, texture, etc?

As it turns out, I got the creamy variety of Skippy’s Reduced Fat peanut butter (though crunchy is also available). Actually, it’s labeled as “Peanut Spread”, so I'm guessing that it doesn’t meet some legal definition of “peanut butter”. In smaller print, it also says “60% peanuts”. Ordinarily, I’d wonder what the remaining 40% was, but Skippy’s FAQ answers that:

Skippy Reduced Fat peanut butter spread uses maltodextrin (a type of corn starch) to replace some of the fat in peanuts. It also contains soy protein, and mineral supplements in addition to the standard peanut butter ingredients. For additional information on ingredients in Skippy products visit our Nutritional Facts section.

Still this is only a “reduced fat” product, not a low-fat one. After all, a serving of this “reduced fat” peanut butter still has almost as much fat as a Snickers bar (12g vs 14g, respectively). Of course, the peanut butter also has about 100 fewer calories than the Snickers bar (190 vs 280, respectively).

Ok, on to the taste and texture, the important parts. It spreads just like normal peanut butter, and its texture is identical (as far as I can tell). And, the taste is good, too. Of course, I only ate some in the context of a peanut butter and banana sandwich (so maybe I wasn’t getting the full-on peanut effect), but I definitely enjoyed it. That, and I'm not exactly a peanut butter connoisseur, as I probably haven't had real peanut butter in about 5 or 6 years (and, no, Resse’s products don’t count as real peanut butter).

But, all in all, I was very satisfied. And, I’d buy it again. The key here, I think, is that this is only a “reduced fat” product, as opposed to an actual “low fat” product. Due to government food-labeling laws, “low fat” has specific legal meaning (that is, the food must actually be low in fat). But, with “reduced fat”, that merely means that the reduced-fat version has less fat than the full-fat version. So, as is usually the case, reduced-fat foods are healthier, while still tasting good.

Looking over the rest of Skippy’s FAQ, I saw this entry on giving peanut butter to children and infants:

[...] Young children, especially 2 to 3-year olds, can be at risk of choking on foods. When serving peanut butter to young children spread it thinly. For easier eating, peanut butter can also be thinned by mixing with mashed banana, apple sauce or yogurt.

Of course, I have no infants to deal with, but that excerpt did give me an idea that I could use those very techniques to thin my own peanut butter. So, perhaps by adding yogurt to my already reduced-fat peanut butter, I might be able to achieve truly low-fat peanut butter. Perhaps I’ll try a peanut-butter-yogurt-banana sandwich sometime.